
   
|
 |
Innovative Teaching Practices
USASBE Clearinghouse For
Innovative Practices in Entrepreurship Education
Sponsored
by the Education Division
United States Association for Small Business and Entrepreneurship
Overview
The Innovative Practices
Clearinghouse has been set up to facilitate the sharing of best practices in
the entrepreneurship classroom. The teaching ideas presented here are being
shared voluntarily by faculty members from universities across the United
States. They are based on classroom experiments that have proven successful
over a number of semesters. USASBE does not officially endorse these practices,
and is not able to provide further information on a given idea. Those wanting
more information should directly contact the faculty member who submitted the
idea. E-mail addresses are provided with each of the innovations. New teaching
innovations are added to this site twice per year.
Table of Contents
|
Innovation |
Title |
|
|
The Real-Time
Case, Jim Theroux, University of Massachusetts |
|
|
The One Page
Business Plan, Peter H. Hackbert, Sierra Nevada College |
|
|
Entrepreneurship
Journal, Peter H. Hackbert, Sierra Nevada College |
|
|
Networking
Referral Stories, David Newton, Westmont College |
|
|
An
Entrepreneurial Final Exam, William J. Walsh, Syracuse University |
|
|
Turning
Engineers Into Entrepreneurial Managers, George Kalidonis, Illinois Institute
of Technology |
|
|
Law for
Entrepreneurs Assignment, Brent Nicholson, Bowling Green State University |
|
|
Sector
Opportunity Study, Tom Dean, University of Colorado at Boulder |
|
|
Two Cool
Assignment, Marcie Sonneborn, Syracuse University |
|
|
Who is an
Entrepreneur Anyway?, Amy V. Beekman, George Mason University |
|
|
Invention
Marketing Exercise, LoAnn Ayers, Washington State University |
|
|
The
Impossible Dream, Don Weinrauch, Tennessee Tech University |
|
|
Mind Mapping
Assignment, Criss Collins |
|
|
Client
Hunting, Michael Stoica, Washburn University |
|
|
Chocolate
Fish, Andrew Cardow, Unitec Institute of Technology |
|
|
How To Become
And Stay A Millionaire, Donna Kelley & Len Green, Babson College |
|
|
Temporary
Inc. of Rockville, Robert Chelle, University of Dayton |
|
|
Inventor's
Challenge, Minet Schindehutte, Miami University |
|
|
Accelerator
Online, Amy Chubb, University Business Center |
|
|
The
Student/Faculty Entrepreneurial Research Fund, Norman Scarborough, Presbyterian
College |
|
|
Creativity
and Opportunity Identification, Norris F. Krueger, Jr., Ph.D., Idaho State
University |
|
|
Family
Business Student Success: Creating a Personal Development Plan, Greg McCann,
Stetson University |
|
|
A Systems
Perspective on Family Business Curriculum: Family Integration Into Student
Learning, Jill Perry, Stetson University |
|
|
The
Entrepreneurial Audit, Michael Morris, Syracuse University |
|
|
Marketing
Inventions, Michael Morris, Syracuse University |
|
|
Bug Report,
Marcie Sonneborn, Syracuse University |
|
|
Which One is
the Entrepreneur?, James Richardson, University of Hawaii |
|
|
Entrepreneurial
"Live" Cases, Jill Kickul and Maureen Vasquez, Simmons College |
|
|
Computer
Game Development Design, Steven Herrnstadt, Iowa State University |
|
|
Socratic
Integrative Excercise, Michael D. Meeks, San Francisco State University |
|
|
From
Theory to Reality: Questioning the Mystery Entrepreneur, Catherine Pratt, Pacific Lutheran University |
| Innovation 1: The
Real-Time Case |
Jim Theroux
University of Massachusetts
Phone: 413-545-5677
Email: theroux@som.umass.edu |
|
 |
|
The Sloan Foundation, the Coleman
Foundation, the Kauffman Foundation, Inc. magazine, and a consortium of
business schools committed funds to produce a new type of business education
called the Real-Time Case (RTC).
Here is the course description
that students found at four universities last year:
As you read this, the managers of
a new high-tech company, Optasite Inc., are striving to achieve the
entrepreneurial dream. On a special website you will follow that company, and
see their progress week by week. But you will do more than just watch. You will
be actively engaged with the company, analyzing its problems, and making input.
You will be participating in the world's first in-depth, real-time case study.
Unlike traditional case studies,
this real-time case will dig deeply into one company during an entire semester.
At this moment, a case writer is stationed full-time at the case company. Each
week the writer will provide us with the information we need to analyze a
particular problem or question about the company. But our goal is not analysis
for its own sake. Instead, we want to go beyond critiquing, and make valuable
recommendations to the company. The company is counting on us to perform, and
we want to deliver.
Survey data from students
indicated that the real-time case appealing: two-thirds of the students rated
it equal to or better than any course they had taken previously. Satisfaction
scores were the highest ever recorded at two universities. Steps are being
taken now to make the make a new real-time case each year, and to use it for
teaching business subjects in addition to entrepreneurship. |
|
|
 |
|
The business plan and business
plan presentations are key tools, used by both entrepreneurial educators and
collegiate entrepreneurs. This presentation demonstrates an experiential
teaching-learning technique applied in undergraduate courses for both
entrepreneurial majors and for liberal arts undergraduates with interests in
entrepreneurship. As a modified version of the "one pager" new venture summary
plan submitted by entrepreneurs to angel investors and at venture capital
funding source presentations, this teaching technique shows students how to
answer five critical questions asked of all new ventures: What are you
building? Why does this business exist? How will you build the business? What
is the work to be done? What results will you measure?
The One Page Business Plan (OPBP)
is a very straightforward, versatile, consistent, flexible tool and can be used
for a variety of purposes. There is no room for fluff or filler in this
exercise. The use of key words and short phrases tells the reader or audience
that only the essence of the "business concept" is being presented for review.
The fact that the business model is only one page communicates that the
investment in reading and listening is limited. The OPBP can be used by
students to develop a plan for a small company, or as a summarization exercise
of a traditional business plan. The OPBP purposes extend to profit centers,
departments, program or projects. As a document that summarizes the ideas for a
new business, the OPBP is also a presentation tool or a personal or
professional planning device.
At Sierra Nevada College, we have
adopted this technique in entrepreneurship courses taught across the curriculum
to liberal arts students. In two 45 minute sessions, with the support of a
workbook, students follow templates, complete worksheets, and review their new
venture proposals collaboratively first with a learning partner and them within
small groups. For larger classes, a OPBP poster session is appropriate. Future
entrepreneurs learn the power of strategic words and short phrases. Students
learn the process of integrating all of their inter-disciplinary studies, both
in academia and real-life to create a compelling story of how they are going to
build a successful business. Students learn that everyone sells through out
their careers even if their profession is not sales. Finally students learn
to tell the "story" of their business with just enough facts and details to
convince the audience that the business is viable, but leave the audience
wanting to schedule a meeting to learn more.
By the end of the exercise,
students learn the value of stating the vision, mission, strategies, objective
and plans for their new ventures. At the conclusion of the Sierra Nevada
College entrepreneurship course required of all liberal art students, all
students are required to stand and deliver a ten minute presentation of their
new venture. The OPBP is the foundation for that public presentation delivered
to faculty, students, college and university staff and invited member of the
business and entrepreneurial community. |
| Innovation 3:
Entrepreneurship Journal Individual Reflection |
Peter H. Hackbert
Sierra Nevada College
Email: phackbert@sierranevada.edu |
|
 |
|
As you move through this course
we will provide you with the opportunity to "do" or engage in many learning
activities to advance your knowledge and entrepreneurship understanding. You
will be gathering information form a variety of sources, to test the value and
benefit of your observations.
Reflective Observation
your discernment of the learning outcome
In analyzing the entrepreneurial activity:
-
What did you notice or learn that you want to remember?
-
In what way did this experience challenge my assumption(s) about
Entrepreneurship?
-
I identified correctly the following (entrepreneurial concept, problem, facts,
timeliness, issues, importance, causes). That was because of ?
-
My classmates helped to identify the following (entrepreneurial concept,
problem, facts, timeliness, issues, importance, causes). That was because of
?
-
Which of my values was affirmed by this experience?
-
What have I learned about myself in this experiential situation?
-
The most successful part of this entrepreneurship activity for me was? Why?
-
The new skill or "piece" of knowledge I can to see in this situation was?
-
I liked/disliked about this experience I contributed
-
If I could do any part of this experience over, it would be? Why?
-
What I learned in other experiential activities in this course that helps me
better understand this most recent experience is?
Abstract Generalization
your conclusions from the outcome
In developing insightful instincts:
-
What hypothesis, conclusion, principles, or guidelines can I draw from this
most recent experience reflecting on the Entrepreneurship?
-
From this experience I developed the following hunch(es) about
entrepreneurship
-
From this experience I learned the following principle(s) about
entrepreneurship
-
From this experience I can see the value of the following guideline(s) for
entrepreneurship
-
From this experience what can I do to affect the greatest potential for
improvement in my understanding of entrepreneurship
Active Experimentation
your decision of what to do next as a result/outcome
In assessing what to do next:
What do you need next in order to
have confidence (the feeling that you will perform well) in your own
entrepreneurial abilities, in your won readiness to use what you have learned
in this course? What do you need to create an opportunity to test your hunches
or conclusions in another situation? Who or when can you gain an opportunity to
practice certain entrepreneurship skills?
-
Of the items that I noticed in the reflective process of the entrepreneurial
activity, I want to practice
-
The one or two new "pieces" of new knowledge" that I experienced and I want to
try out is
-
I can go to for an opportunity to practice and gain a new entrepreneurial
skill?
-
In my current situation, the people who are in my expanded network practicing
these skills are
-
As I think about entrepreneurship and extra-curricular activities, I might
select to practice the skills or abilities (conduct a trial) and increase my
competence are
-
Of the thing(s) I saw in this situation, I am eager and excited to attempt
-
The opportunity for learning that I want to pursue as a result of this
experience is
|
| Innovation 4: Networking
Referral Stories: Undergraduate Forging of Strategic Alliances in Just 15 Weeks |
David Newton
Professor of Entrepreneurial Finance
Westmont College
Santa Barbara, California, USA 93108-1099
Email: newton@westmont.edu |
|
 |
|
The Network Referral Stories
(NRS) file is a highly effective teaching strategy that has proven itself over
11 years to be a valuable link for students, between the regular schedule of
course reading assignments and an on-going interactive dialogue regarding the
realities of entrepreneurial perseverance. The NRS file creates a critical mass
of self-selected mentoring resources during the semester for the course
"Entrepreneurship and New Venture Development". This 15-week cumulative project
augments the start-up business plans developed by the student new venture
teams, and has proven to be extremely valuable to students on four-key fronts:
1) initiates an on-going dialogue,
2) builds new venture vision and perspective,
3) forges high-level advisory relationships, and
4) secures extraordinary internships.
The NRS file requires each
student to bring in one standard manila folder. They each mark the tab
"CURRENT" and I then explain that this 9"x12" space will become their most
valuable resource during the next 15 weeks as they are introduced to
entrepreneurship and the new venture development process. I open my briefcase
and pull out my own "CURRENT" folder and in just 10 minutes, I present them
with my most recent NRS entries from my personal consulting projects over the
last month or so.
NRS entries include: someone's
business card, a clipped article about an intriguing entrepreneur, a phone
number for a great referral, a web URL or email address for a related product
or service, maybe a brochure picked up at a trade fair or exhibit. Other areas
from which to draw NRS material include: a) firm owners cited in the Pacific
Coast Business Times (a local weekly covering new businesses, venture
capital, entrepreneur profiles), b) personal introductions made at the monthly Central
Coast MIT Enterprise Forum, c) the individual chosen by each student
for the EIE (entrepreneur interview editorial) assignment, and d) cold call
referrals secured during the research of the student teams' start-up business
plan.
There is just one rule for the
NRS folder: Only put something in that has value-added potential. It must be
followed-up within two weeks or it gets dropped from the folder. I can ask any
student on any day (with no prior notice) to open the folder, and in five
minutes, relay a compelling "story" to the class from the student's growing
list of professional contacts. And they can also ask me to do the same. This
creates a heightened awareness in class as students work very hard to have great
contacts, so they are able to add value to the semester's on-going dialogue
about entrepreneurial success and new venture development issues. The NRS file
can be tailored to fit with all course readings, topics covered by outside
speakers, all phases of researching new venture ideas, and in meeting all
milestones for the start-up business plan semester project. |
| Innovation 5: An
Entrepreneurial Final Exam |
William J. Walsh
Syracuse University
Email: wiwalsh@syr.edu |
|
 |
|
One of the difficulties in most
entrepreneurial courses is what to give for a final examination. This past
semester I had the opportunity to develop and teach a course entitled
"Financing the Emerging Enterprise". In this course we examined all of the
possibilities for financing a new venture including bank debt, private
investors, venture capital and IPO's. As we progressed toward the end of the
semester I was searching for a perfect final that would test what the students
learned, but more importantly give them some hands on experience with the
problems facing entrepreneurs.
At our University sponsored
Entrepreneurship conference, I met Fred Nelson who is the CEO of a company
called Accounting Computers Inc. He has been very successful in the past, with
a turn-key computer system for distributors, but is now caught in a change of
technology. Fred told me how he had put together a business plan and was
wrestling with whether or not to bring in partners, private investors or
venture capitalist. I invited him to present the question to our class, and he
enthusiastically agreed. What followed was a live final exam, based on an
actual company presented by the CEO and majority shareholder.
Fred came to the class in the
second last week and presented his business plan, which was also on his web
site so that the students could access it at any time. This was complete with a
full set of financial statements and current operating results. After a
half-hour presentation, the students were able to ask questions and get as much
background as they needed. During the week that followed they not only had
access to the information but could also contact Fred by e-mail. Their
assignment was to come up with the best financial and business strategy for the
company. They were to hand in a written presentation complete with any
attendant analysis. Then the following week Fred returned and each member of
the class presented their strategy in person to him. The results were
spectacular. The exchange between the students and the owner was direct and
pointed. Fred was impressed with the "freshness of ideas" that the students
brought. The students responded with gusto to a rare opportunity to analyze a
real privately held, entrepreneurial driven company. They gained an experience
that I'm sure will stay with them the rest of their lives.
I realize that this was a unique
opportunity, and duplicating it will be difficult. However, the point is that
the closer we can get our students to the reality of the problems facing
entrepreneurial firms, and give them some practice at developing solutions, the
more successful we will be as educators. |
| Innovation 6: Turning
Engineers Into Entrepreneurial Managers |
George Kalidonis
Illinois Institute of Technology
Email: george.kalidonis@iit.edu |
|
 |
|
The student group consisted of 23
part-time students who were working engineering management professionals
working mostly in the wireless communications industry. All held undergraduate
degrees in an engineering field. The primary objective of the course was to
provide each student with a realistic experience the nature of entrepreneurial
management.
Description of the Teaching
Practice
The vehicle for the course pedagogy the Balanced Scorecard (BSC) developed by
Kaplan & Norton. The beginning of the first class session was devoted to
explaining the course objectives including a detailed discussion the course
structure. The teacher ended the first class session by leading the class
through a training session in BSC methodology using training materials provided
by the Balanced Scorecard Collaborative.
At the beginning of the second
class session, the teacher established a live or real time case study.
The teacher began playing the role of the Chair and CEO of a global wireless
telecommunications provider addressing a group of senior and mid-level
executives. The key points in his remarks to the management team were: |
 |
| 1. |
Each person had been assigned to
this special task force whose objective would be to research, develop, and
enact a detailed commercialization plan for the next generation wireless
device. The commercialization plan would take the form of a business process
model/map and must include:
-
strategic analysis, and strategic themes
-
strategic goals paired with financial goals/metrics that served as measures of
the success of each strategic goal
-
detailed plans, programs, projects, that enacted, enabled, and supported each
strategic goal
-
identified and document all of the costs required to commercialize the
innovation
-
a clear description of the value creation process
|
| 2. |
The task force was to provide
the Chair with a weekly written and verbal report on the project's progress
to-date for the next eight weeks (the balance of the quarter). After reviewing
each weekly report, the Chair would provide commentary on the work to-date, and
guidance for the next phase of the project via email. A final formal report was
to be made to the CEO/Chair and the board of directors the following week
(final exam week) along with a formal written document containing the
commercialization plan along with all necessary supporting documents. |
| 3. |
The students were then informed
that the entire class of 23 students was to become a single commercialization
task force. Leadership and organization of the team and its work schedule was
to be completely determined by the task force by whatever means it chose to
use. To insure that each task force member's incentives were aligned, the same
course grade was to be given to every member of the team based solely upon the
board of director's assessment of the commercialization plan and the valuation
of the new business unit after five years of operations. |
| 4. |
If any team member did not
perform up to the team's standards, the Chair/CEO would transfer the individual
to another project (a separate term paper). In effect, that would be a
termination of employment and subject to a different compensation (grading)
system. |
|
 |
|
Staying in role, the Chair/CEO
responded to clarification questions, insisting that everyone stay in the role
they chose to play. The Chair/CEO then reminded that his office was located
directly across the hallway from the conference room, and that he would
available only the same evening each week for limited face-to-face
consultations. At other times, the Chair/CEO could be reached via email. The
Chair/CEO then walk out of the conference room (classroom) and did not return
until the 10th week of the course to participate in the task force's
presentation of their final report with the exception of an unscheduled 15
minute observation visit.
Observations and Conclusions
The course took on a life of its
own between the 4th and 5th class sessions or three weeks into the task force
project. The students had taken control of the project and entrepreneurial
leadership began to emerge at the strategic, operational, and tactical levels.
The final report was a masterpiece. |
| Innovation 7: Law for
Entrepreneurs Assignment |
Brent Nicholson
Bowling Green State University
Email: bnichol@cba.bgsu.edu |
|
 |
| Bob, Carol, Ted and
Alice are planning to start a barnstorming business. Bob and Carol are pilots
with a love of old biplanes. Bob, in fact, is a professional pilot. Carol is an
amateur pilot and works for an advertising agency. Ted is a CPA with a local
accounting firm who loves old planes and flying. Alice also loves old planes
and flying and is retired from an upper level management position in a
manufacturing company. She is fairly wealthy and willing to invest $50,000 in
the new business venture.
Bob and Carol want to quit their
jobs and work for the new business full time. Ted is planning to stay with the
CPA firm for the time being but will handle the accounting for the business.
Alice is looking to put her money in something she is passionate about which
this business is. Bob, Carol and Ted have little money to invest. All parties
expect that the business may lose money for the first year or two but are
confident that in the long run it is a viable business venture.
One item the business will
obviously need is an old biplane. Bob has found one that is in good shape but
needs about $10,000 worth of repairs. The plane could be bought for $150,000.
Eventually, the business will want several such planes. The plan is to
eventually acquire the planes and hire a few pilots and travel the country
conducting air shows and doing barnstorming demonstrations. They will also take
people on rides for a fee. For now, Bob and Carol will have to do all the
traveling and flying. Carol will also handle the marketing and advertising for
the business.
The parties have approached you
as a new business consultant and asked for your recommendations regarding the
start up of the business. Specifically, they want your recommendation as to the
form of business in which they should operate (along with the reasons for
recommending that form) as well as preparation of the necessary documents
to accompany that form of business, i.e. a partnership agreement, articles of
organization, an operating agreement, articles of incorporation, bylaws, etc.
You will need to create a name for the business, last names for the owners, and
any other information needed for the start up documents. Identify any
assumptions you made or information that would be helpful in making your
recommendation that was not furnished. Consider ancillary items like stock
options, repurchase agreements, tax elections, etc. The more aspects of the
start up you consider, the better your project.
Your recommendations and
accompanying documents should be typed. While you may (and should) consult
resources outside your textbook, you may not share documents with each other. Each
student is expected to do their own work and come up with their own
recommendations. You will be asked to briefly present and defend your
recommendations to the class. The assignment is due September 25 at class time. |
| Innovation 8: Sector
Opportunity Study |
Tom Dean
Leeds School of Business
University of Colorado at Boulder
Email: deantj@colorado.edu |
|
 |
|
A few years ago, I had the idea
that the standard "business plan" approach to entrepreneurship education
reflected neither the reality of the process of entrepreneurship, nor the ideal
approach to helping students find good business ideas. In most entrepreneurship
courses, students "brainstorm" an idea and then write a feasibility or business
plan to evaluate the viability of that idea. In reality, most entrepreneurs
begin with an idea that is generated from substantial industry, product, or
technology experience. While some students bring such experience to the table
and have already generated what may be a high quality idea, many have not, and
the resultant business plans suffer. Furthermore, the process does little to
teach students how to apply business school tools to identify opportunities.
I argue that the best approach to
entrepreneurship education may not be to start with the idea and move to
analysis (the business plan model), but to start with analysis and, through the
creative process, move to idea generation (and later more extensive
evaluation). Thus, I propose the concept of a Sector Opportunity Study wherein
we start with a given sector (broadly defined vertically), analyze the sector
through various strategic/analytical frameworks, and thereby identify
opportunities within the sector. Thus, we start with an industry and search for
an opportunity. Similarly, we begin with analysis and move to creativity,
rather than starting with creativity and moving to analysis. The final outcome
should be a list and description of potential opportunities. From there, the
second entrepreneurship course can be utilized to translate the idea into a
business plan.
The Sector Opportunity Study can
be seen as an intelligent, flexible, and narrowing search process. While
searching various information sources and applying analytical tools students'
should be alert to indications of potential opportunities, as the
identification of an opportunity will likely result from attentiveness. Quite
naturally, the direction of search may
change over time to reflect the
evidence brought to light.
The following is the related
process I have proposed to my students. I'm certain that it could be enhanced,
but it is a start:
-
Define the boundaries of the sector. This will be a critical step, as it will
help insure that we can complete the project within the scope of the semester.
The sector can represent an entire industry, a strategic group within an
industry or a technology that is likely to impact an industry or a number of
industries. If you choose the latter, I encourage you to focus either on the
technology itself rather than the impact on a specific industry, or select and
analyze one sector the technology will impact
-
Analyze the structure and value chain of the industry. In performing this task,
it is appropriate to think in terms of the entire value chain of the industry.
Many opportunities for improving the efficiency or customer value created by an
industry reside in the linkages between various stages in the production of the
good or service.
-
Analyze the major players at each stage of the industry.
-
Identify potential opportunities.
|
| Innovation 9: "Two Cool"
Assignment |
Marcie Sonneborn
Syracuse University
Email: msonneborn@tdo.org |
|
 |
|
Rationale: To help
"Introduction to Entrepreneurship" students to look for opportunity in what
they read and hear, and to help them to develop a creative approach to new
business development.
Required Activity: To
bring to class two of the coolest products, ideas, concepts, technologies,
information items or whatever grabs your interest/captures your imagination
that you can find during the week.
Each week you are required to
document "two cool" items and their sources (forms provided by instructor). For
each class, be prepared to present one of the two items when they are being
shared. The class will then select one item from those presented, and will
brainstorm (either in teams or with the entire class we may alternate) about
different ways to commercialize the concept, and discuss some of the barriers
and opportunities inherent in the idea.
Possible Sources of Cool Items:
World Wide Web, journals (trade, industry, scientific), magazines, newspapers,
other media, other entrepreneurs
Note: This is an activity that
counts toward the student's class participation grade. The exercise will take
about 35-45 minutes, usually at the beginning of the class period, unless there
is a guest speaker. |
 |
|
"TWO COOL"
EEE 370-Spring 2002 Mondays
7:00-9:45 p.m.
Name:
_________________________________________________________
Date of Class session): _____________________________________________
Cool Item # 1
_____________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________
Source of Information for Cool
Item #1 ( e.g., journal and issue date, source and date of news broadcast,
etc.):
_____________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________
Cool Item # 2
_____________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________
Source of Information for Cool
Item #2 ( e.g., journal and issue date, source and date of news broadcast,
etc.):
_____________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________
Comments:___________________________________________________________________ |
 |
|
"TWO COOL"
Instructions
Objectives:
1) To create awareness of
innovation in our surroundings; to help EEE 370 students to look for
opportunity in what they read and hear, and to help them to develop a creative
approach to new business development.
2) To give students practice
scanning their environment for new ideas.
3) Used early in the semester to
help students to get acquainted with each other as a group and in newly-formed
teams.
4) To introduce business concepts
in short, experiential bursts.
5) To be a vehicle for discussion
about whether the concepts are just cool ideas or real opportunities.
Preparation:
One week before the assignment is
due, give the students the following instructions with the form on the other
side:
Group Instructions:
"Bring to class two of the
coolest products, ideas, concepts, technologies, information items or whatever
is truly innovative and grabs your interest/captures your imagination that you
can find during the week. This should be a concept that is totally new to you.
Each week that I announce we will
have "Two Cool" the following week, you are required to document two "cool"
items and their sources (forms provided by instructor). For each class, be
prepared to present one of the two items when they are being shared. (If
someone else has an item similar to yours, you have the second item as a
back-up.)
Possible Sources of Cool Items:
Internet (sites for patents, inventions, new products, MIT Media Lab, etc.),
journals (trade, industry, scientific), magazines, newspapers, other media,
other entrepreneurs"
Class activity/Process: After
generating a group list of Two Cool items with the entire class (recorded on an
overhead projector or someplace where all can see them), the class will then
select one item from those presented, and will brainstorm (either in teams with
each team selecting a different concept, or with the entire class on the same
concept we may alternate) about different ways to commercialize the concept,
and discuss some of the barriers and opportunities inherent in the idea.
Student Presentation: Select
a spokesperson (or two) to present the team findings. Professor either comments
after each team, or debriefs at the end of the discussion, summarizing the
important points that were made in the discussion.
Supplies: Markers and
large pads of paper for teams to record their responses; tape to put up the
large sheets around the room so all can see them.
Alternative discussion topics:
1) Team: elevator speech You
are the management team for this company. You are to prepare an elevator speech
which captures the interest of a potential investor in two or at the most,
three sentences. Then select a spokesperson to present the elevator speech.
(One other team member may assist by holding the paper for the class to read
the important points which the spokesperson presents. I usually ask someone
from another team to role play the investor in the elevator.)
Preparation: Prior to this Two
Cool discussion session, I spend about 5 minutes explaining what is an elevator
speech and asking the class what they think are some examples of important
points.
2) Team: business model concepts
"Think about your team's Two Cool concept and what it would take to start a
business around this concept. Provide five statements about what is needed.
(Examples:What is the size of the business? What specifically is your product,
if not obvious? Who is your market? What special expertise is needed to start
this business?)"
After the team presents their
item, as a group we discuss (in rapid-fire response from the tops of their
heads) how much (capital) might be needed to start this business. Some respond
with very high amounts and some with low amounts. I ask why it would cost so
much or so little and by the end of the discussion, we usually have a couple of
alternative models that could be used to develop a business around the concept.
(Examples of alternatives: National versus regional market, bootstrapping
versus investor capital, borrowed resources and outsourcing versus buying
everything and setting up own operations, etc.)
Hints:
1) I generally take between 15
and 25 items depending on the number of students in the class and the amount of
time I have allocated to the discussion. Early in the semester I use this as a
way to generate discussion and get students comfortable speaking in the class
group. I also get them used to my calling on them randomly when no one
volunteers. The risk is low in this exercise and they learn that I expect them
to be prepared to participate.)
2) This is an effective exercise
if done twice in a semester, and early in the semester, using different
discussion topics. More than twice, it loses its impact and spontaneity.
3) I count this activity toward
the student's class participation grade. The exercise takes about 5 minutes to
generate the list, 10 minutes for team discussion, 15-20 minutes for
presentations with instructor comments, and another 5 for the wrap-up (total
40-45 minutes).
Originator of exercise:
Marcene Sonneborn
President of Innovation Management Consulting, Inc.
Adjunct, Syracuse University
School of Management
EEE Program
Phone: 315-425-5144
Fax: 315-233-1259
Email: mssonneb@eznet.net or
msonneborn@tdo.org
|
| Innovation 10: Who is an
Entrepreneur Anyway? |
Amy V. Beekman
George Mason University
Email: abeekman@gmu.edu |
|
 |
|
Exercise Description:
On the first
evening of class, I like to start the semester by getting students to think
about who is an entrepreneur. The two big questions I pose are: 1) do traits
common to all entrepreneurs exist and 2) are there specific behaviors required
of all entrepreneurs? To answer these questions, I use an exercise with three
separate components.
First, without having read
anything, I ask them these two questions and record their responses in a list
on the board.
Second, I expose them to 2
entrepreneurs with seemingly very different approaches. You can do this with
articles, cases, and the like but I have found that I can engage them
effectively by using short videos. The Greif Entrepreneur Center (USC Marshall
School of Business) produces videos of speeches by their "Entrepreneurs of the
Year" which are well done. Last semester, the students watched a 20 minute or
so speech by Sky Dayton (founder of EarthLink) and another one by Angelo Mozilo
(founder of Countrywide Credit Industries).
After watching/reading about one
of the entrepreneurs, I ask the students to revisit their list and amend it
based on how the speech by the entrepreneur changed their perceptions.
I then have the students watch
the second video and again come back to their list, think about how the traits
or behaviors might have changed, and make additions or refinements to the list.
Third, we compare and
contrast the entrepreneurs and try to reconcile the differences between the
entrepreneurs and develop a distilled list of traits/behaviors.
Objectives:
To identify/expose stereotypes students may have about entrepreneurs and
the skills required to be an entrepreneur. Help students clarify the essence of
entrepreneurship and understand the common thread on the multiple paths to
successful entrepreneurship.
Preparation:
No preparation is required from the student's perspective. The instructor
needs to familiarize him/herself with the entrepreneurs.
Resource materials:
Cases, articles, or videotapes.
Set-up:
VCR, whiteboard or chalkboard
Process:
The three steps of the exercise take some time. I usually allot at least
1/1/2 hours for it. Since my class is usually at night and are scheduled for 2
hour blocks, I spend a little time going over the syllabus and course
expectations and then devote the rest of the class to this discussion. If you
have a shorter class session, you could do this on the second day of class.
Another option is to only use one entrepreneur in identifying and discussing
relevant traits/behaviors. You might choose one that will be very different
than common perceptions of an entrepreneur.
Key Lecture Points:
Entrepreneurs have many different characteristics. While it is hard to come
up with a definitive set of traits that describes all entrepreneurs, there are
some critical behaviors essential to the success of a new venture. For example:
an entrepreneur must be able to identify a clear underserved need, exhibit
passion about that opportunity, demonstrate flexibility and resourcefulness in
the pursuit of that opportunity and assemble a good team/delegate. (In
contrast, for example, you can discuss how the age of the entrepreneur,
the experience of the entrepreneur in that industry and the experience of the
entrepreneur in starting a business may vary a great deal from firm to firm).
Most entrepreneurs are calculated risk takers rather than gamblers but are able
to tolerate ambiguity well. Regardless of the industry, innovation is
essential. Industries may define what constitutes innovation differently but
some new combination must exist. The entrepreneurial venture is typically
growth oriented. |
| Innovation 11: Invention
Marketing Exercise |
LoAnn Ayers
Washington State University
Email: ayers@tricity.wsu.edu |
|
 |
Objectives:
Students participating in the Invention Marketing Exercise will:
-
Experience how a product gets from R&D to market.
-
Explore the different perspectives of the inventors and marketing
professionals.
-
Learn the difference between product features and customer benefits.
Preparation and resource
materials:
-
This exercise requires an assortment of parts that can be used to create new
productswhich can be a variety of things one could find in an office, kitchen,
workshop or toy box including plastic wheels, wooden dowels, paper towel tubes,
clay, giant paper clips, empty pen tubes, spatula, small boxes, etc. Four to
six of these pieces are put into a paper lunch bag. A bag is prepared for each
team of four students. All bags are placed on a table at the front of the room.
-
One roll of masking tape is needed for each team. This is the "product
adaptation material."
-
A clock or watch to time exercise segments.
-
One slip of notepaper is needed for each student. This is the "secret ballot."
-
Four each of the following or similar are needed as prizes: Gold medal winners
receive a small bag of gold foil covered, chocolate coins; second place winners
receive a "cool grand" (frozen Hundred Thousand Grand chocolate bars).
Set-up:
No special room arrangement is required. Assign students to teams of four. Two
students will be the inventors; two students will be the marketing consultants.
They may self-select their roles. Students will move to sit with their team
mates.
Group instructions and process:
Our goal is to get a glimpse at the invention-to-market process from two
perspectives--the inventor and marketing department.
-
The inventors will have 5 minutes to create a product from the company's
invention laboratory (the table with the lunch bags). They will select a bag,
bring it back to their group's table, empty the bag, create a product using
only the contents of the bag and a limited amount of "product adaptation
material" (masking tape). During this time, the market consultants may observe
and take notes but may not speak. Invention is the purview of the R&D team.
The inventors must also define:
-
What is the product? (i.e., this is an automatic side-mirror cleaning device
for trucks)
-
What are the important product features? (it is solar-powered, with independent
controls, etc.)
-
At the end of the inventors' time, the marketing consultants will have 5
minutes to draft an initial marketing strategy including:
-
Define most profitable initial target market
Is this B2B? or B2C? Describe primary characteristics of the most likely target
market (i.e., long-haul truckers in the East)
-
Design the 4Ps
-
Product: Name of product and what unique benefits it provides (what does it do
for the customer).
-
Price: All raw materials and production costs total $5/piece for the initial
quantity. Determine your pricing strategy (sold by each, any quantity
discounts, packaged with other products) and the sales price per unit.
-
Place: Determine if there are any unique packaging requirements or special
shipping requirements. Will they be sold to distributors, over the Internet,
directly through retail, etc.? Describe the fundamentals of your distribution
strategy.
-
Promotion: Tell how your target market will discover and purchase your
invention. Describe how you'll get their attention, demonstrate benefits, and
convert curiosity into orders.
-
The teams then make a 4-minute presentation to the Board of Directors
(remainder of the students). The Board will vote on the top two inventions to
be marketed this year using a secret ballot. Each Board member will indicate
their 1st and 2nd choices. The President (course instructor) will tabulate
votes to select the winners. If your team is selected, you get a fabulous
bonus.
Discussion questions:
-
To inventors: What was the most important thing you were thinking about when
you designed the product?
-
To marketers: What do you wish you could have said to the inventors as they
developed their product? What were some of the key pieces of information about
the market that you were missing in developing your initial marketing strategy?
-
What is similar/different about the perspectives of the investors versus that
of the marketing consultants?
Key lecture points:
Those who create products often focus more on improving design, enhancing
technical qualities, etc. which may or may not be important or even perceptible
to the target marketthey are product feature focused. Successful product
introduction matches product attributes to the benefits desired by the market.
"Marketeers" are benefits focused; they design the 4 Ps to garner customer
acceptance (and sales). The more intimately they know their target market, the
better the match and the steeper the sales curve.
Originator of exercise:
LoAnn Ayers
Washington State University
2710 University Drive
Richland, WA 99352
Phone: 509-372-7252
E-mail: ayers@tricity.wsu.edu
|
| Innovation 12: Man of La
Mancha, the Impossible Dream, and Entrepreneurship |
Don Weinrauch
Tennessee Tech University
Email: dweinrauch@tntech.edu |
|
 |
|
Objectives:
-
To appreciate the importance of brainstorming
-
To learn where entrepreneurs may find ideas for new ventures
-
To integrate personal interests and preferences to an opportunity
-
To overcome some myths and emphasize that an idea may not translate into an
opportunity
-
To appreciate the trends, such as aging population and elder care, that may
enhance small business start-ups
-
To exchange ideas with a partner via email, and then the entire class
-
And, to start the team process for writing a small business plan
Set-up:
-
Each student in the class is given a two page typewritten homework assignment:
-
list their brainstorming ideas for a new business
-
outline their interests, preferences, and expectations
-
list relevant trends in society and
-
a short paragraph on how one of their ideas matches their personal preferences.
(To save time, everything is in outline form except for "d").
-
After typing this assignment they must email it (as an attachment) to a partner
to get feedback. They then cut and paste their partner's response on the bottom
of their own paper.
-
At the start of the next class, I play the Broadway tune "The Impossible Dream"
and place the papers around the classroom
-
The class then has 30 minutes to walk around and read section "a" of as many
papers as possible. They take informal notes on different ideas that they have
read.
-
After 30 minutes, I ask the class to orally state which ideas they like the
best and if these ideas have a high probability of success. I then have a
fifteen-minute wrap-up on key points.
What Happens:
The class realizes that there are so many ideas to explore. Yet, many of them
may not really be a viable opportunity in the marketplace. Students also
appreciate the importance of integrating ideas with their own preferences and
interests. And, unlike Don Quixote, they realize that successful entrepreneurs
are more than dreamers and idealists.
Discussion Questions:
-
How does the song tie-in with the assignment and entrepreneurship?
-
Where do ideas for small business start-ups come from? Which sources are the
most popular? What are some common methods, such as checklists, to encourage
brainstorming?
-
What are some of the myths that exist about entrepreneurship?
-
How do we know if an idea is a good opportunity? What impact do the trends in
society have on creating new ventures?
-
Why is it so important to make sure that your idea for a new venture ties-in
with your personal lifestyle wishes?
Key Summary Lecture Points:
-
Match your personal lifestyle preferences with the type of business you might
start. Don't pick a venture that might make you miserable as an entrepreneur.
Also, know the difference between lifestyle and high growth businesses.
-
Recognize common brainstorming techniques, but know that an idea is not always
a good opportunity. A successful entrepreneur is more than a dreamer and
idealist.
-
It takes time to search for a good opportunity
-
Recognize where entrepreneurs frequently obtain ideas for a start-up
-
Integrate the trends and societal needs with your own ideas. You must begin the
process of seeing if your best idea has merit for actually becoming a small
business venture. You now have a beginning process in starting your team
project for writing a small business plan.
|
| Innovation 13: Mind
Mapping Assignment |
| Criss Collins |
|
 |
|
Objective of First
LessonStudents will develop a Mind Map that will provide an insightful look
into their own personal strengths and weaknesses. In the second lesson students
will create another Mind Map looking at themselves as potential entrepreneurs.
A Mind Map is a powerful graphic
technique, which provides a universal key to unlock the potential of the brain
using both sides (leftlogic, analysis, sequence, etc. and rightimagination,
daydreaming, color, etc.) plus Gestalt (seeing the whole picture). It was
created by Tony Buzan in the late 1960's and is used in many businesses today.
Depending upon the level of the
student, a Mind Map could be simply explained as a tool similar to a road map
that uses right brain logic and left brain creativitya fun and unique way to
examine themselves, a topic or a problem.
Resource materialsattached
Mind Maps.
Instructions or rules of Mind Mapping:
(Normally the person building the Mind Map creates the central idea and the key
words. These have been provided in the prepared Mind Map in order to have
consistency in thinking in order to make comparisons from the first lesson to
the second. As much color should be used as possible. A completed sample Mind
Map is also included in order for the student to view the finished product.
-
The more branches created from the key words, the more effective the Mind Map.
-
Use images, words, symbols, codes and dimensions throughout.
-
Print in upper and lower case letters.
-
Use outlines to embrace all branches from each key word.
-
Look at the sample Mind Map for direction.
-
Work as fast as you can.
-
Let your thoughts go.
-
Do not dwell on any idea.
-
Write down each word on its own line and connect it to another.
Discussion: Describe the
experience. Were you honest about yourself? How would you compare to any
successful entrepreneur you might know? Did you learn any new about yourself?
Lecture Points: What do
you think are the characteristics that make for a successful entrepreneur? Is
there a "perfect background" to be an entrepreneur? What are the most common
problems areas? How can weaknesses be corrected? Can anyone be an entrepreneur?
(The first and second lessons go together. The students should leave with
questions and ideas that are answered in the next lesson.)
Sources:
Make the Most of Your Mind, Tony Buzan
Use Both Sides of Your Brain, Tony Buzan
The Mind Map Book, Tony Buzan
Starting Your Own Business, Jan Norman
No B.S., No Holds Barred, Kick Butt, Take No Prisoners, and Make Tons of Money
Business Success Book, Dan Kennedy
Entrepreneurship, Hisrich and Peters
http://www.mapyourmind.com/
http://www.mind-map.com/ |
|
|
 |
|
Objectives:
Students will have an entrepreneurial experience. They learn how to look for
and find a client for their marketing plan. They learn how to plan for, design
and conduct a presentation to convince a potential client (to market
themselves). This represents a useful way to start the class, to develop team
bonds, and to get good quality marketing plans. Students have the opportunity
to talk to a variety of business owners, entrepreneurs and have a better
understanding on how to approach them.
Description:
This exercise takes place in the first two weeks of the Marketing Management
class I teach (case class). The class meets for three hours, once per week.
Students have to prepare a marketing plan for a client they have to find. The
marketing plan will be orally defended in the last class meetings.
First class meeting:
Rules of the game are presented to the students:
-
Students form teams. Teams of two students work best. If the class is big
--> teams of three.
-
Each team will have to work for a client, a local business, and develop a
marketing plan. Students have to look for prospects and convince them of
the usefulness of their work (students have to show creativity and
entrepreneurial sprit to convince).
-
Teams have two weeks to find clients that will accept them as "consultants."
-
In the 3rd class meeting each team will make a short presentation (less than 4
minutes) and share with the class their trials and lessons learned.
-
Students will work with the client and develop the marketing plan.
-
Students will defend their marketing plan by the end of the semester. They have
to turn in the plan to the client (first copy + cover letter) and the
instructor (second copy + cover letter). The final grading is based on the
client's feedback, the class and the instructor's grading.
During the two weeks (between the
first class meeting and the third one) the instructor is available for advice,
coaching, etc. The second class meeting is not related to client hunting.
Third class meeting:
Each team will present (short presentation of less than 4 min) their findings.
They share with the other teams the lessons learned while "client hunting:"
What did they do to find a
client? How did they approach the client? How painful it was? How many refusals
and what was the reason for each refusal? What did they learn from refusals?
Did they have a plan or did they improvise? What approaches are working? What
can you tell about future cooperation during the elaboration of the marketing
plan? How interesting the marketing plan will be? This will trigger an
interesting class debate on how to find and work for a client:
-
How demanding "clients" are;
-
How busy clients are (you have their attention for several minutes only);
-
How hard it is to "sell"
Notes:
-
If a team cannot find a client in time the instructor calls the SBDC to assist
the students.
-
The exercise is not difficult to implement. The exercise was used to start the
class for several years. The instructor has to have a back-up plan for teams
that are unable to find a client (in this case the on-campus SBDC). However, it
did not happen frequently.
-
The exercise can be used in any case class (such as entrepreneurship strategy
or business plan development).
-
I am giving the students two weeks to hunt. I tried one week too. It was not
enough for many teams to find clients.
Appendix
Summary of students' findings:
Ideas for selling themselves as a
team of consultants:
Plan the activity: several
teams acted systematically. They conducted secondary research (for example
yellow pages), elaborated lists with desired industries/businesses, established
criteria, and ranked them, systematically approached the prospects, made
presentation, etc. (however, very few less than 20 percent did so)
Elaborate a list of preferences
(the majority had established a short list)
Call friends, relatives and ask
for help (more than 75 percent used this)
Visit the SBDC on-campus
and ask for clients that need help (less than 50 percent thought to use the
SBDC. Conclusion: the SBDC does not market itself efficiently, or at least, is
not visible enough)
Call prospects to set appointments
(is it wise to call? It seems it's better to go and speak to the manager/owner
see the whites of his/her eyes)
Plan the selling presentation
(what to tell, how to behave during the 5-10 minutes they can hope get the
manager's attention)
Interesting approaches:
You get professional help for free
(the majority used this approach)
Help us: the instructor is mean
and will skin us alive if we do not come up with a client to work for (it
seemed to work in several instances)
A combination of the above
This represents an interesting
exercise in preparing a "sales presentation" and a warm-up for what will happen
in class for the rest of the semester. Students work hard to find a client. It
turns out to be a sort of competition between teams (though it was not designed
to be one).
One student put it best: This is
entrepreneurship in action. Other findings:
-
It is hard
-
Very often they were refused (even by relatives and/or friends).
-
Each failure represents a learning experience: They learn how to better sell
themselves and what changes to make in the next presentation
|
|
|
 |
| Break the class
into groups then tell them they need to come up with a product. They then have
to source the materials for the product without purchasing anything or by
utilizing rubbish found around their house factory business. They then have to
sell this thing on campus to complete strangers not friends, family,
classmates, faculty or relations, or even support staff. I give a week to do
this, one session forming, the week to produce, the next session to sell. Then
a debrief and a chocolate fish each to the group that made the most cash. I
choose manufacturing because it means they need to assemble stuff. |
| Innovation
16: Managing Growing Businesses (Or "How To Become And Stay A
Millionaire!") |
Donna Kelley
Babson College
dkelley@babson.edu |
Len Green
Babson College
lgreen@babson.edu |
|
 |
|
Research Project: Analysis of a
Fast Growing Company
Your (consulting) "team" has just
met with a new client the CEO of one of the 2001 Fortune Small Business 100
Fastest-Growing Companies. After the meeting, you receive the following email:
To recap the discussion we had today:I am thrilled with the growth our company
has experienced so far, but am concerned about its continued growth prospects
as we move forward. I am particularly interested in understanding more clearly
the key elements underlying our success, and what could threaten our future
competitiveness.
Finally, I would welcome your
"team's" recommendations for "Action Steps" for our company, based on your
research and analysis. As agreed I will arrange a meeting on 10/16/01 at
1:45p.m. with members of our senior management and board of directors. I am
looking forward to your presentation at this meeting. Meanwhile, please do not
hesitate to obtain all information from whatever sources you feel can provide
you with the facts necessary to arrive at the best solution.
The Project
1.Your team's job is to apply
your resourcefulness and ambition to make recommendations to the company.
Merely going to the company's website won't cut it!
2.Once your team analyzes what
you've found, prepare a report for the CEO. Accompany the report with a cover
letter to the CEO, summarizing the most significant information detailed in
your report, as well as your recommendations. Remember, entrepreneurs usually
do not read more than a few pages of data, so your report should be concise
(max. 6 pages double-spaced) yet reflective of your extensive research and
thorough analysis.
3. Your presentation will be
accompanied by an interactive discussion between members of your team and the
panel (representing the board and senior managers of the "company").
4. The "company" may challenge
anyone on your team, so be prepared! Each team will be graded on their
thoroughness, ingenuity, outside the box thinking and creativity.
5.The team with the most
thoroughly and creatively researched and analyzed report will enjoy a
chauffeur-driven limousine ride around campus for team members and their
friends as well as the just reward of "being the best". |
| Innovation 17: Temporary
Inc. of Rockville |
Robert Chelle
University of Dayton
chelle@udayton.edu |
|
 |
|
I have my entrepreneurship major
students invite their parents who own businesses to campus. The parents address
the UD Entrepreneurship Club the night before class. The presentations to the
Club are about their family businesses and the dynamics that occur in a family
business. The following morning, the parents have read the attached case, as
have the students, and each parent takes one of the proposed questions and
answers it the best they can.
Then the entire class expresses
opinions on each question. After all five questions have been answered,
transfer of company ownership is looked at in an entirely new light.Temporary
Inc. of Rockville (TIR) is a locally owned franchise, started and owned by
Martin Edwards since 1965. TIR is part of the global Temporary employment
system. TIR pays a fee to Temporary, just like other independent' franchises,
and receive benefits such as national marketing, software systems, some legal
advise, and seminars for employee development.
Martin, now 60 years old, wants
to turn over management control to two sons who are active in the business.
Older son Bill is a natural people person', and most agree would be the
logical next President. Mike, the current CFO, would logically stay as CFO when
Martin steps down as the current President. Martin's intention is to promote
Bill from VP of Sales to President and leave Mike as CFO.
Besides these two sons, Martin
has another son and daughter not active in the business. Both live in
Rockville, have successful careers, and do not participate in the company in
any way, other than listening to the normal war' stories at family events.
TIR operates profitably and has
no debt. There are no major issues with current management other than the
routine struggle for market share and trying to stay with or ahead of
competition.
Martin and his wife feel that the
only fair way to divide-up the current common stock owned solely by Martin is
to give 25% of the stock to each child. Martin believes that since the children
are mature enough to handle the responsibility of business ownership, and with
the history and respect for the family' company, each child will place the
best interests of the company before each individual's self interest.
Martin has come to you. As a
highly respected friend and fellow family business owner, he is looking for
advice, sensing that there may be potential trouble spots he may be
overlooking.
(Please disregard any tax issues
for sake of simplicity. Other issues like compensation, contracts, control,
risk, and liability are fair game!)
-
Before Martin gives any promotions or stock to the children, what general
advice would you give him?
-
Would you agree to simply divide the stock equally among the four children, or
should Martin consider other methods of stock or equity distribution, while
still keeping the distribution fair'?
-
Assuming for discussion purposes that Martin does make an equal stock
distribution, what kinds of trouble may surface in the future among the four
siblings?
-
Would you recommend to Martin that he not interfere in any way once the
transition is accomplished, or would you suggest he find some way of staying
involved with company management? If he should stay involved somehow, what
methods of involvement might be appropriate?
-
Since each child has been given a good education and has no unusual financial
or physical needs, share your thoughts with Martin about whether simply selling
TIR for the highest price, and giving each child an equal monetary
distribution, might be a legitimate alternative.
|
| Innovation 18:
Inventor's Challenge |
Minet Schindehutte
Miami University
schindm@muohio.edu |
|
 |
|
I use this exercise in an
Innovation and Entrepreneurship class, but it could also be used in an
innovation or creativity module in a conventional entrepreneurship class. It is
an excellent ice breaker for the first day of class where students don't know
each other.
Objectives:
-
Encourage students to think out-of-the-box
-
Introduce students to the new product development process
-
Appreciate different problem solving skills
-
Use rapid prototyping (fail fast to succeed sooner)
-
Understand functionality versus features versus the managerial challenge
-
Learn to build on the ideas of others
Preparation:
No advanced preparation required
Resource Materials:
-
Stack of newspapers and 3 rolls of scotch tape
-
Spaghetti and pack of small marshmallows
-
A prize for the winning team (something fun; something inexpensive one for
each member in the group).
Set-up:
Move all the tables and chairs out of the way to create large open spaces for
groups to construct their product. Divide class into 5 teams of 4-6 students.
Group instructions:
-
Choose one of the 2 sets of construction materials i.e. either the tape and
newspaper or the spaghetti and marshmallows.
-
Build a structure that reaches as high as possible.
-
The structure you build must have an "identity", e.g. a rocket or a church
steeple.
-
The group with the tallest structure wins a prize. However in order to win the
prize, you have to know each of the group member's name and something special
about them.
-
You have 10 minutes to complete the exercise.
No other instructions are provided besides the above i.e. the execution is
completely open for interpretation to allow for creative solutions. Beyond
these instructions answer every question with a question.
Process:
-
Materials are selected (1 min)
-
Students typically brainstorm to decide what to build and then do a quick
division of labor (3-5 min)
-
Building (and rebuilding failed attempts) (7-10 min)
-
Review each group's structure and ask them to report the process they followed
(10-15 minutes)
-
Link exercise to innovation (5 10 minutes)
Discussion questions:
-
What do you think exercise was about?
-
What do you think about the materials you decided to use? Would you choose the
other materials if you were asked again? Why?
-
What assumptions did you make? Did this limit your creativity?
-
Can you identify the different problem solving skills of individuals in your
group or between the groups?
|
| Innovation 19:
Accelerator Online |
Amy Chubb
University Business Center
5245 N. Backer Ave., MS/PB 5
Fresno, CA 93740-8001
achubb@csufresno.edu |
|
 |
|
AcceleratorOnline, (http://www.acceleratoronline.com/)
was created by the University Business Center at Fresno State, targeting
entrepreneurs who are unable to attend live classroom training, but who are
motivated to start their own business. AO was based on the entrepreneurs'
training program offered through the Central Valley Business Incubator.
Through AcceleratorOnline,
Web-based, online courses have been developed for training in business plan
development. These Blackboard courses are accessible from the project's Web
site. Customers apply online and receive notification within 48 hours of
application. If accepted, they receive a login and password that gives them
access to the curriculum. The curriculum has six components. Trainees have two
months to complete a business plan. Usage and access are closely monitored.
The unique aspect of
AcceleratorOnline, however, is the delivery of services. Trainees communicate
using discussion boards and e-mail. E-mails can be sent from the instructor to
the group or from the instructor to an individual. Similarly, trainees can
communicate with one and other or hold group discussions. In addition, a
consultant is available on an anytime, anywhere basis to provide assistance and
answer questions. Trainees are required to submit their homework online.
Coursework and homework assignments are geared toward constructing the final
business plan.
Originally funded through state
and federal grants, AO is now a fee-based service. About 50% of our trainees
have launched a business.
We also run parallel classes
addressing the needs of very low-income areas, which, in addition to access
online, also provide hands-on classroom training and assistance. Computer banks
and high-speed Internet access are offered as well. |
| Innovation 20: The
Student/Faculty Entrepreneurial Research Fund |
Norman Scarborough
Presbyterian College
nmscarb@presby.edu |
|
 |
|
Presbyterian College is building
the Student/Faculty Entrepreneurial Research Fund to enable students and
faculty to engage in a variety of entrepreneurial projects both now and in the
future. Fund-raising started in January 2003 with a goal of at least $312,000,
and already the college has raised 80% of the total. The first project on the
college's list is to create an upscale restaurant in the downtown area. (PC
sits in the middle of a small town, and the college is an integral part of the
community.) Last fall, as part of the business plan competition in my Small
Business Management course, two students worked with a local restaurateur to
build a business plan for this upscale restaurant. The college has created a
unique partnership with a local building owner, the restaurateur, local
investors, students, and faculty to create a limited liability company that
will serve as the source of capital for this restaurant project. Once the
restaurant is established, students will have the opportunity to explore a
variety of real-world management issues in the field. Future projects will
involve faculty and students working to develop other businesses in the
community. |
| Innovation 21:
Creativity and Opportunity Identification |
Norris F. Krueger, Jr.,
Ph.D.
Faculty of Entrepreneurship
Idaho State University
Phone: 208-426-3573
nkrueger@boisestate.edu |
|
 |
|
Plan A: Offer them a very brief
business scenario, preferably in an industry they know little about (say,
airlines or trucking) - and ask them to identify as many "very good"
opportunities as they can in, say, 10 minutes). You also ask them to assess
their own competence in this setting. The quantity - and especialy the quality
of the opportunities tends to correlate with the perceived competence. (I've
also used your scale as a covariate as well.)
Plan B: Split the class in half
and give one group some rea | |